For MIPS-eligible clinicians, 2026 performance affects Medicare Part B covered professional service payments in 2028. The performance threshold is 75 points. A final score of 75 results in a neutral adjustment, while scores below that threshold can result in a negative adjustment and scores above it may earn a positive adjustment subject to budget-neutral scaling.
Know the threshold and the payment risk
CMS sets the maximum negative adjustment at 9 percent for the lowest score range. Scores below 75 receive a negative adjustment on a sliding scale, while scores above 75 may receive a positive adjustment. The amount of any positive adjustment is not fixed because it is scaled under federal budget-neutral rules.
Keep score tracking connected to operations
Quality, cost, improvement activities, and promoting interoperability each have defined roles in the MIPS final score. For the 2026 performance period, CMS assigns 30 percent each to quality and cost, 15 percent to improvement activities, and 25 percent to promoting interoperability. The reporting plan should name who owns each measure, where supporting information is reviewed, and how the practice will catch a problem early enough to respond.
Do not wait for the end of the year
A practical cadence is more valuable than a last-minute scramble. Review eligibility, reporting path, available data, and progress throughout the performance period. Practices should also keep up with current CMS guidance because measures, policies, and scoring details can change through rulemaking.
Keep billing and clinical reporting aligned
Billing does not replace MIPS reporting, but billing workflows can surface useful questions about documentation, coding, patient attribution, and payer patterns. When clinical, compliance, and billing teams compare what they are seeing, they can spot gaps before the reporting deadline or a payment adjustment makes the issue more expensive.
How ACP helps
ACP helps practices keep the billing-side picture clear while they work through MIPS-related workflow questions. Practices can talk with ACP about reimbursement operations, reporting visibility, and the next practical step.
Related guidance
2026 Medical Billing Priorities for a Stronger Revenue Cycle
A practical look at the front-end checks, claim workflows, payer follow-up, and reporting habits that protect reimbursement.
AI in Medical Billing: Where It Helps and Where Human Review Matters
AI can help teams organize work and surface patterns. Human review remains essential for coding judgment, payer requirements, and protected information.
Prior Authorization in 2026: Workflows That Protect Claims
Why authorization tracking, clear documentation requirements, and timely follow-up matter as payer processes evolve.
